Refery vs Jack & Jill

Human referrals, or AI agents?

Refery and Jack & Jill are both pay-on-success recruiting platforms serving startups. One runs on a human network of operator-scouts. The other runs on two AI agents. Here is the honest comparison — and why pricing is not the right thing to optimize for.

How Jack & Jill works

Two AI agents, one hiring loop.

Jack & Jill, founded in London and raised $20M from Creandum in October 2025, operates two AI agents. Jack is the candidate-facing agent: candidates have a 10–20 minute conversation with Jack, who builds a profile, suggests roles from 14 million live listings, and can coach through interviews. Jill is the company-facing agent: hiring managers brief Jill on a role, and she surfaces candidates from Jack's network — reportedly 169,000+ engaged candidates as of late 2025.

When Jill finds a match, she makes an introduction to the candidate (through Jack) on behalf of the hiring company. The fee structure is 10% of first-year salary on successful hire, with a 3-month refund if the employee leaves. No exclusivity. Integration with Ashby is available for pipeline management.

The product is genuinely good. The AI conversations are natural, the match quality is high, and the pricing is half of a traditional agency. Jack & Jill is a serious platform and the right fit for many hiring situations.

How Refery works

A human network of operator-scouts.

Refery is the opposite bet: instead of optimizing for AI-driven scale, Refery optimizes for the quality of who is doing the referring. The network is 300+ curated scouts — founders of billion-dollar companies, CTOs from publicly traded tech companies, fund partners at top-tier VCs, senior engineers and talent leaders from the fastest-scaling companies.

When a hiring company sends a role to Refery, the platform routes it to scouts whose personal networks are most likely to contain the right person. The scout refers someone they know personally, have worked with, or have been watching for years. Every referral is vetted by Refery's committee before reaching the hiring company. The fee is 20% of first-year salary on successful hire, with a 90-day replacement guarantee.

The question is not which platform is better. The question is what kind of signal you want. Jack & Jill returns candidates that an AI agent has matched to your role from their engaged candidate pool. Refery returns candidates that a specific operator — someone who built or invested in the kind of company you are — has personally vouched for.

At a glance

Side by side, honestly.

ReferyJack & Jill
Source of candidatesPersonal referrals from 300+ operator-scouts (founders, CTOs, investors)AI-agent matching from 169,000+ engaged candidates on Jack's platform
Referral signalPersonal vouch from a named operatorAI-inferred fit score based on conversation + role brief
Success fee20% of first-year salary10% of first-year salary
Upfront cost$0$0
Replacement / refund90-day free replacement, or 50% fee credit3-month full refund if employee leaves or is dismissed
Already-in-pipeline policyNo feeNo fee
Service modelManaged — one Refery contact + vetting committeeSelf-serve AI agents + human support
Geographic focusSan Francisco, New YorkLondon, expanding in SF
Stage focusSeed to Series BStartups, scale-ups, knowledge-worker roles broadly
ATS integrationsDirect handoff; works alongside any ATSNative Ashby integration
How to choose

Match the tool to the hire.

The mistake most founders make when comparing these two is leading with price. At 10% vs 20%, the fee difference on a $200K hire is $20K — which sounds like a lot until you price out six months of a wrong senior hire at an early-stage company. The question that matters is which source of signal is more likely to produce the right hire.

Choose Refery if

  • You are hiring for a role where the wrong person costs the company a quarter, a market window, or a customer segment
  • You want a named operator's personal vouch on the candidate — not an AI match score
  • You are at seed through Series B in SF or NY, hiring in engineering or GTM
  • You value a managed service with one contact point and a vetting committee
  • You would rather pay 2x on a short list of high-signal candidates than pay less across a wider AI-matched pool

Choose Jack & Jill if

  • You are hiring at volume, across many roles, and want to minimize fee spend
  • Your role is well-defined in ways an AI brief can capture, and you are comfortable with AI-driven candidate selection
  • You want native Ashby integration and an AI-driven pipeline workflow
  • You are open to candidates from a broad pool across knowledge-worker verticals — not only founder-adjacent operator networks
  • You are hiring in the UK/EU in addition to the US, where Jack & Jill has stronger density
A note on AI vs human

Neither is universally right.

The recruiting industry is in the middle of the same transition every other knowledge-work industry is going through: figuring out which parts AI can do better, which parts humans can do better, and where the two should work together. Jack & Jill is a strong expression of the AI-first bet. Refery is a strong expression of the human-first bet — specifically, the bet that for the most important hires at the most important stage of a company, operator-level signal still compounds in ways AI matching cannot yet replicate.

Both bets will be right for different hires. The practical posture for most founders is not tribal — it is pragmatic. Use AI-driven tools where they dominate. Use operator referrals where the signal premium matters. Adjust as the tools evolve.

Questions

Common questions.

Jack & Jill uses two AI agents — Jack for candidates and Jill for hiring companies — to match candidates from their own platform network to open roles, with no human recruiter in the loop. Refery uses a curated human network of 300+ founders, CTOs, fund partners, and senior operators who personally refer candidates they know. Jack & Jill optimizes for speed and scale of AI-driven matching. Refery optimizes for depth of operator signal on each referral.
The two platforms have different cost structures. Jack & Jill runs AI agents against a self-service candidate pool; marginal cost per additional match is low, which enables the 10% fee. Refery compensates human operator-scouts $15K–$40K per successful placement in exchange for personal referrals from their own networks — that is the main reason the fee is higher. The tradeoff is source quality: Jack & Jill candidates come from a pool of people who have interacted with the Jack agent; Refery candidates come through a personal vouch from someone who built what you are building.
Yes. Neither is exclusive. Some hiring teams use Jack & Jill for mid-senior roles where AI-driven matching at scale works well, and Refery for founder-adjacent or operator-level hires where personal signal matters most. Both integrate or run alongside internal TA and ATS tools such as Ashby.
Yes. Jack & Jill raised $20M from Creandum in late 2025, has 169,000+ candidates on its network, partners with Ashby, and has visible customer traction in London and SF. The product is well-designed and the pricing is competitive. It is the right choice for many hiring situations — particularly where speed and candidate volume matter more than personal-vouch signal.
Both offer a 3-month replacement or refund commitment. Jack & Jill offers a full refund if the hired employee leaves or is dismissed within 3 months. Refery offers free replacement sourcing within 90 days, or a 50% fee credit toward the next hire if no suitable replacement is available. The commitments are comparable in intent; check the specific terms with each platform for your situation.

Your next hire is one intro away.

Send us the role — a JD, a Notion doc, or just a paragraph. We will come back within 48 hours with a plan and first introductions.

Start hiring →